Biomics

A study was conducted on the use of various schemes of stress effects with an elevated temperature for the selective selection of cell lines of wheat for heat resistance. It was established that the presence of endophytic bacterial infection also cardinally changes morphogenetic processes in vitro.The endophytic pathogen was identified as one of the strains of Pseudomonas syringae.The factor that stimulated the manifestation of bacterial infection was temperature stress.

wheat, in vitro, temperature stress, resistance, regenerative potential, endophytic infection, Pseudomonas syringae.

1. Нгуен Тхи ли ань Повышение устойчивости яровой пшеницы к абиотическим стрессам методами биотехнологии // Автореф. дис. на соиск. уч. степ. канд. биол. наук. СПб. 1995. 22с. (In Russian) [Nguyen Thi Li an. Increasing the stability of spring wheat to abiotic stress by methods of biotechnology//Author's abstract. Dis.attain.of a scien. degreeof biol. sciences . 1995.22P].
2. Никитина Е.Д., Хлебова Л.П. Особенности морфогенеза яровой мягкой пшеницы в культуре in vitro в зависимости от условий произрастания // Ульяновский медико-биологический журнал. №2. С.125–131. (In Russian) [Nikitina E.D., Khlebova L.P. Features of morphogenesis of spring wheat in culture in vitro depending on the growth conditions. // Ulyanovsk Medical Biological Journal. 2015. N2. P. 125–131].
3. Самедов А.Н., Могелевская М.Н., Алиев Дж.А., Алиев Л.А. К вопросу о возбудителях бактериозов винограда // Изв. АН Аз.ССР (сер. биол. наук). 1988. N С. 26-31. (In Russian) [Samedov A.N., Mogelevskaya M.N., Aliyev J.A., Aliyev L.A.On the issue of exciters of bacteriosis of grapes // Proceedings of the Acad. Sci. Az. SSR (biol. sci.) 1988. N5. P. 26-31].
4. Самедов А.Н., Могелевская М.Н., Карагезов Т.Г., ХудавердиеваС.Р., Алиев Л.А. Обнаружение возбудителей бактериозов винограда на территории Апшерона //Изв. АН. Аз. ССР (сер. биол. наук). 1988. №6. С.18-23. (In Russian). [Samedov A.N., Mogelevskaya M.N., Karagezov T.G., Khudaverdieva S.R., Aliyev L.A. Detection of exciters of bacteriosis of grapes in the territory of Apsheron // Proceedings of the Acad. Sci. Az. SSR (biol. sci.). 1988. N P. 18-23].
5. Abouzied H.M. Assessment of genetic diversity among wheat somaclonal variants lines using morphological traits and molecular markers // Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011. V. 1(66). P. 1451–1486. doi: 10.5897/AJB11.1759
6. Akhtar S., Niaz M., Rahman S., Asif M. Study of somaclonal variation in wheat for the induction of salinity tolerance // J. Agric. Res. 2012. V. 50(2). P. 165–176.
7. Hussain M., Khan G.S., Shaheen M.S., Ahmad M. Somaclonal variation in regenerated plants of ten wheat genotypes // J. Agric. Res. 2001. V. 39. № 11. P. 1–7.
8. Kaepler S.M., Kaepler H.F., Rhee Y. Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants // Plant. Mol. Biol. 2000. V. 43. P. 179–188.
9. Larkin P.J., Scowcroft W.R. A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement // Theor. Appl. Genet. 1981. V. 60. N4. P. 97–214.
10. Miguel C., Marum L. An epigenetic view of plant cells cultured in vitro: somaclonal variation and beyond // Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011. V. 62. N 11. P. 3713–3725.doi: 10.1093/jxb/err155
11. Murashiqe T., Skoog F.A. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures // Phisiol. Plant. 1962. V.15. N 13. P. 473 -497.
12. Rakoczy-Trojanowska M. The effect of growth regulators on somaclonal variation in rye (Secale cereale ) and selection of somaclonal variants with increased agronomic traits // Cell Mol. Biol. 2002. V. 7. P. 1111–1120.