eISSN: 2221-6197 DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197

Botanical and geographical descriptions and establishment of phylogenetic relationships of some species of the family Moraceae – producers of latex, including known rubber-bearing plants base

Year: 2024

Pages: 244-259

Number: Volume 16, no. 3

Type: scientific article

Summary:

The differences in the ranges, morphological structure, and molecular biological characteristics of representatives of all tribes of the Moraceae family – modern and accepted in the past - are considered. Special attention is paid to economically important natural rubber-bearing plants from this family – Castilla elastica, Castilla ulei and Ficus elastica from the tribes Castilleae and Ficeae, respectively. Based on the homology of the nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS 1 and ITS 2) of rDNA, a study of the phylogenetic relationship of about three dozen genera and 53 species of Moraceae was conducted. The analysis revealed 7 branches, generally corresponding to the five already recognized tribes of Moreae, Artocarpeae, Dorstenieae, Castilleae, Ficeae, and two more tribes described recently – Maclureae and Parartocarpeae. The heterogeneity of the genera Streblus, Trophis and Broussonetia has been confirmed. The species Treculia africana and Treculia obovoidea turned out to be in a single branch not with the Artocarpeae tribe, but with representatives of Dorstenieae, and most closely with Brosimum alicastrum. The tribes Ficeae and Castilleae with plants not only containing latex, but also rubber producers, turned out to be sister to each other and phylogenetically the nearest.  

Keywords:

mulberry family, Moraceae, Castillaceae tribe, Castilleae, Castilla elastica, rubber-bearing plant, latex, ITS 1, ITS 2, phylogeny

References:

1. Alvarez I, Wendel JF. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003. V.29(3). P.417-434. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00208-2

2. Baldwin BG. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the compositae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1992. V.1(1). P.3-16. doi: 10.1016/1055-7903(92)90030-k

3. Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue M. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence of Angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot Gard. 1995. V.82. P.247-277. doi: 10.2307/2399880

4. Berg C.C. Flora Malesiana precursor for the treatment of Moraceae 8: Other genera than Ficus. Blumea 2005. V.50. P. 535–550. DOI: 10.3767/000651905X622815

5. Berg C.C. Moreae, Artocarpeae, and Dorstenia (Moraceae) with introductions to the family and Ficus and with additions and corrections to Flora Neotropica Monograph 7. Flora Neotropica. 2001. V. 83 . P. 1-346.

6. Berg C.C. The Castilleae, a tribe of the Moraceae, renamed and redefined due to the exclusion of the type genus Olmedia from the “Olmedieae”. Acta Botanica Neerlandica. 1977. V. 75. P. 73-82.

7. Berg C.C. Flora Neotropica Monograph 7: Olmediae, Brosimae (Moraceae). New York. 1972. 228p.

8. Bhadra S., Mohan N., Parikh G., Nair S. Possibility of Artocarpus heterophyllus latex as an alternative source for natural rubber. Polymer Testing. 2019. V. 79(6). 106066. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106066

9. Chemeris A.V., Vakhitov V.A. The primary structure of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacers of rDNA in the diploid wheat Triticum urartu Thum. ex Gandil. Molecular Biology. 1989. V.23. P.320-326.

10. Clement W.L., Weiblen G.D. Morphological Evolution in the Mulberry Family (Moraceae). Systematic Botany. 2009. V. 34(3). P. 530–552. DOI: 10.1600/036364409789271155

11. Conn B.J., Damas K.Q. Guide to Trees of Papua New Guinea. 2024. URL: https://www.pngplants.org/PNGtrees (Accessed on: 01 Oct 2024)

12. Corner E.J.H. The classification of Moraceae. Gard. Bull. Singapore. 1962. V.19. P. 187-252.

13. Datwyler S.L., Weiblen G.D. On the origin of the fig: phylogenetic relationships of Moraceae from ndhF sequences. Am J Bot. 2004. V. 91(5). P.767-777. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.5.767

14. Flora of China Online. Moraceae. Streblus Loureiro. 2024. V.5. P. 28. URL: https:// http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxo n_id=131674 (Accessed on: 01 Oct 2024)

15. Gardner E.M., Garner M., Cowan R., Dodsworth S., Epitawalage N., Arifiani D., Sahromi, Baker W.J., Forest F., Maurin O., Zerega N.J.C., Monro A.K., Hipp, A. Repeated parallel losses of inflexed stamens in Moraceae: Phylogenomics and generic revision of the tribe Moreae and the reinstatement of the tribe Olmedieae (Moraceae). Taxon. 2021. V. 70. P. 946-988. DOI: 10.1002/tax.12526

16. Gillespie A.R., Bocanegra-Ferguson D.M., Jimenez-Osornio J.J. The propagation of Ramón (Brosimum alicastrum Sw.; Moraceae) in Mayan homegardens of the Yucatan peninsula of Mexico. New Forests. 2004. V. 27. P. 25–38. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025081224852

17. Golovkin B.N., Zolkin S.Yu., Trofimova I.A Medicinal botany. Moscow. 2019. 326 p. + 12 p.ill. (In Russian).

18. Jagtap U.B., Bapat V.A. Artocarpus: A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2010. V.129(2). P. 142- 166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.03.031

19. Kiss T, Kis M, Abel S, Solymosy F. Nucleotide sequence of the 17S-25S spacer region from tomato rDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988. V.16(14B). P.7179. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.14.7179

20. Kloucek P., Svobodova B., Polesny Z., Langrova I., Smrcek S., Kokoska L. Antimicrobial activity of some medicinal barks used in Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2007. V. 111(2). P. 427–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.11.010

21. Kuluev B.R., Garafutdinov R.R., Maksimov I.V., Sagitov A.M., Chemeris D.A., Knyazev A.V., Vershinina Z.R., Baymiev An.K., Muldashev A.A., Baymiev Al.K. Chemeris A.V. Natural rubber, its sources and components. Biomics. 2015. V. 7(4). P. 224-283. (In Russian).

22. Kuluev B.R., Sagitov A.M., Knyazev A.V., Muldashev A.A., Baymiev An.K., Milyukova O.G., Kinzyabulatov R.R., Fateryga A.V., Fedyaev V.V., Baymiev Al.K., Lebedev Yu.A., Chemeris A.V. Nonhevea rubber and rubber-bearing plants in the patent documents of past centuries. Biomics. 2018. V.10(3). P.220-246. DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2018-32 (In Russian)

23. Lewinsohn T.M. The geographical distribution of plant latex. Chemoecology. 1991. V. 2. P. 64-68. DOI: 10.1007/BF01240668

24. Macbride J.F. Flora of Peru. Moraceae. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 1937.V. 13(2, 2). P. 274–331.

25. Mennega A.M.W., Lanzing-Vinkenborg M. On thewood anatomy of the tribe “Olmedieae’" (Moraceae) and the position of the genus Olmedia R. & P. Acta Bot. Neerl. 1977. V.26. P.1-27.

26. Nepal M.P., Ferguson C.J. Phylogenetics of Morus (Moraceae) Inferred from ITS and trnL-trnF Sequence Data // Systematic Botany. 2012. V.37(2). P.442-450. DOI: 10.2307/41515134

27. Piva L.R.O., Jardine K.J., Cobello L.O., Gimenez B.O., Durgante F.M., Higuchi N., Chambers J. Q. Demonstration of a Strict Molecular Oxygen Requirement of Yellow Latex Oxidation in the Central Amazon Canopy Tree Muiratinga (Maquira sclerophylla (Ducke) C.C. Berg). Rev. Virtual Quim. 2018. V. 10(5). P. 1316-1326. DOI: 10.21577/1984-6835.20180090

28. Plants of the World Online. 2024. URL: https://wfoplantlist.org (Accessed on: 01 Oct 2024)

29. Poczai P, Hyvönen J. Nuclear ribosomal spacer regions in plant phylogenetics: problems and prospects. Mol Biol Rep. 2010. V.37(4). P.1897-1912. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9630-3

30. Sagitov A.M., Zolkin S.Yu., Kuluev B.R., Gimalov F.R., Knyazev A.V., Chemeris A.V. Castilla elastica Cerv. is almost forgotten rubber-bearing plant. Biomics. 2021. V.13(2). P. 106-137. DOI: 10.31301/2221- 6197.bmcs.2021-9 (In Russian)

31. Schultes R.E. De plantis toxicaris e mundo novo tropicale commentationes XXVI: etnopharmacological notes on the flora of northwestern South America. Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University. 1980. V. 28 (1). P. 1- 45.

32. Schultes R.E. De plantis toxicaris e mundo novo tropicale commentationes XXXII. Notes, primarily of field tests and native nomenclatures on biodynamic plants of the North-West Amazon. Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University. 1983. V. 29 (3). P. 251- 273.

33. Sinjare D.Y.Kh. Molecular identification of Morus ssp. In Duhok using nuclear ITS region and chloroplast Matk gene. Basrah J. Agric. Sci. 2024. V.37(1). P.86-93. doi: 10.37077/25200860.2024.37.1.07

34. Standley P.C., Steyermark J.A. Flora of Guatemala. Moraceae. Fieldiana. 1946. V. 24, Part IV.P.10-58.

35. Stewart W.D., Wachtel W.L., Shipman J.J., Yanko J.A. Synthesis of rubber by Fungi. Science. 1955. V. 122. P. 1271-1272. DOI: 10.1126/science.122.3183.1271

36. Takaiwa F, Oono K, Sugiura M. Nucleotide sequence of the 17S-25S spacer region from rice rDNA. Plant Mol Biol. 1985. V.4(6). P.355-364. doi: 10.1007/BF02418257

37. Tawan C. Ficus elastica Roxb. In: Plant Resources of South-East Asia (PROSEA) No. 18: Plants producing exudates [ed. by Boer, E. Ella, A. B.]. 2000. The Netherlands: Backhuys Publisher. P. 69-73.

38. The World Flora Online. 2024. URL: http://www.worldfloraonline.org (Accessed on: 01 Oct 2024)

39. Useful Tropical Plants. 2024. URL: https://tropical.theferns.info/(Accessed on: 01 Oct 2024)

40. Xuan Y, Wu Y, Li P, Liu R, Luo Y, Yuan J, Xiang Z, He N. Molecular phylogeny of mulberries reconstructed from ITS and two cpDNA sequences. Peer J. 2019. V.7. e8158. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8158

41. Yokota Y, Kawata T, Iida Y, Kato A, Tanifuji S. Nucleotide sequences of the 5.8S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer regions in carrot and broad bean ribosomal DNA. J Mol Evol. 1989. V.29(4). P.294- 301. doi: 10.1007/BF02103617

42. Zeng Q, Chen H, Zhang C, Han M, Li T, Qi X, Xiang Z, He N. Definition of Eight Mulberry Species in the Genus Morus by Internal Transcribed Spacer-Based Phylogeny. PLoS One. 2015. V.10(8). e0135411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135411

43. Zerega N.J.C., Clement W.L., Datwyler S.L., Weiblen G.D. Biogeography and divergence times in the mulberry family (Moraceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2005. V. 37(2). P. 402–416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.004

44. Zerega N.J.C., Gardner E.M. Delimitation of the new tribe Parartocarpeae (Moraceae) is supported by a 333-gene phylogeny and resolves tribal level Moraceae taxonomy. Phytotaxa. 2019. V. 388 (4). P. 253-265.

45. Zerega, N.J.C., Nur Supardi, M.N., Motley, T.J. Phylogeny and Recircumscription of Artocarpeae (Moraceae) with a Focus on Artocarpus. Systematic Botany. 2010. V.35. P.766-782. doi: 10.1600/036364410X539853

Download pdf
up
eISSN: 2221-6197 DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197