Year: 2022
Pages: 68-78
Number: Volume 14, issue 1
Type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2022-5
Topic: Article
Authors: Garafutdinov R.R.!, Chemeris D.A., Khidiyatova I.M., Sakhabutdinova A.R.!, Giniyatov Yu.R., Chemeris A.V.
Although this article is more like scientific fantastic, the creation of “talking” dogs through genetic engineering cannot be ruled out in the near future. The transcription factor FOXP2, which is responsible for communication abilities and articulate speech in humans, may become a key target. This protein is very conservative and in addition to some differences in the polyglutamine area differs in various organisms by single amino acid substitutions. FOXP2 of humans and its closest relative chimpanzees differ by two amino acids, while humans and dogs differ by only one amino acid (p.N303T), caused by a single nucleotide substitution, which can be corrected using CRISPR/Cas genome editing technology. Attempts to create talking dogs can make a significant contribution to the development of research on the effects of normal and defective human FOXP2 genes. In this case, dogs may serve as a more suitable model object for this kind of research. Of greatest interest in terms of giving the ability to talk to dogs are breeds of companion dogs, as well as decorative breeds due to their greater demand and accordingly commercial attractiveness. The barking of dogs, which is practically not used by their wolf ancestors, can be considered a kind of independent attempt by dogs to establish communication with humans during domestication. Undoubtedly, the appearance of talking dogs will entail the development of new bioethical principles.
dog, Canis familiaris, DNA, genome, transgenic dog, “speaking” dog, CRISPR/Cas genome editing
1. Borodin P.M., Malinovskaja L.P. Koshki i geny: 40 let spustja. Nauka iz pervyh ruk. 2020. №4(84). S.6-31. [Cats and genes: 40 years after] (In Russian)
2. Chemeris A.V., Aminev F.G., Garafutdinov R.R., Anisimov V.A., SagitovA.M., Khusnutdinova E.K., Sakhabutdinova A.R., Chemeris D.A., Mihaylenko K.I. DNK-kriminalistika. M.: Nauka. 2022. 466 S. [DNA criminalistics] (In Russian)
3. Chemeris D.A., Garafutdinov R.R., Kuluev A.R., Sakhabutdinova A.R., Kuluev B.R., Chemeris A.V. The diversity of methods for the detection of polymorphic nucleotides in the known SNPs. III. Allele-specific PCR. Biomics. 2022. V.14(1). P. 32-51. DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2022-2 (In Russian)
4. Chemeris D.A., Giniyatov Yu.R., Garafutdinov R.R., Chemeris A.V. DNA polymorphism of dogs (Canis familiaris L.). I. Origin, distribution of dogs in the light of molecular biological data about their mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Biomics. 2021. V.13(3). P. 298-308. DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2021-21 (In Russian)
5. den Hoed J., Fisher S.E. Genetic pathways involved in human speech disorders. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2020. V.65. P.103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2020.05.012
6. den Hoed J., Devaraju K., Fisher S.E. Molecular networks of the FOXP2 transcription factor in the brain // EMBO Rep. 2021. V.22(8). e52803. doi: 10.15252/embr.202152803
7. Enard W., Gehre S., Hammerschmidt K. et al. A humanized version of Foxp2 affects cortico-basal ganglia-28 (In Russian) circuits in mice. Cell. 2009. V.137(5). P.961-971. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.041
8. Enard W., Przeworski M., Fisher S.E., Lai C.S., Wiebe V., Kitano T., Monaco A.P., Pääbo S. Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature. 2002. V.418(6900). P.869-872. doi: 10.1038/nature01025
9. Fisher S.E., Vargha-Khadem F., Watkins K.E., Monaco A.P., Pembrey M.E. Localisation of a gene implicated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nat Genet. 1998. V.18(2). P.168-70. doi: 10.1038/ng0298-168
10. Garafutdinov R.R., Chemeris D.A., Sakhabutdinova A.R., Alexeev Ya.I., Gerashchenkov G.A., Giniyatov Y.R., Aminev F.G., Chemeris A.V. DNA polymorphism of dogs (Canis familiaris L.). III. VNTR- and STR-loci. Their use in dog breeding and in criminalistics. Biomics. 2021. V.13(3). P.321-346. DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2021-23 (In Russian)
11. Gerashchenkov GA, Rozhnova NA, Kuluev BR, Kiryanova OY, Gumerova GR, Knyazev AV, Vershinina ZR, Mikhailova EV, Chemeris DA, Matniyazov RT, Baimiev AK, Gubaidullin IM, Baimiev AK, Chemeris AV. Design of Guide RNA for CRISPR/Cas Plant Genome Editing. Mol Biol (Mosk). 2020. V.54(1). P.29-50. doi: 10.31857/S0026898420010061
12. Giniyatov Yu.R., Chemeris D.A., Yakhin O.I., Garafutdinov R.R., Chemeris A.V. Ancient dogs, dogs and their future. Biomics. 2021. V.13(3). P.288-297. DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2021-20 (In Russian)
13. Gopnik M. Feature-blind grammar and dysphagia. Nature. 1990. V.344(6268). P.715. doi: 10.1038/344715a0
14. Haesler S., Rochefort C., Georgi B., Licznerski P., Osten P., Scharff C. Incomplete and inaccurate vocal imitation after knockdown of FoxP2 in songbird basal ganglia nucleus Area X. PLoS Biol. 2007. V.5(12). e321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050321
15. Hiroshige K., Soejima M., Nishioka T., Kamimura S., Koda Y. Simple and sensitive method for identification of human DNA by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction of FOXP2. J Forensic Sci. 2009. V.54(4). P.857-861. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01063.x
16. Hong S.G., Kim M.K., Jang G., Oh H.J., Park J.E., Kang J.T., Koo O.J., Kim T., Kwon M.S., Koo B.C., Ra J.C., Kim D.Y., Ko C., Lee B.C. Generation of red fluorescent protein transgenic dogs. Genesis. 2009. V.47(5). P.314-322. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20504
17. Hunter P. The riddle of speech: After FOXP2 dominated research on the origins of speech, other candidate genes have recently emerged. EMBO Rep. 2019. V.20(2). e47618. doi: 10.15252/embr.201847618
18. Hurst J.A., Baraitser M., Auger E., Graham F., Norell S. An extended family with a dominantly inherited speech disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1990. V.32(4). P.352-355. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1990.tb16948.x
19. Kim M.J., Oh H.J., Park J.E., Kim G.A., Hong S.G., Jang G., Kwon M.S., Koo B.C., Kim T., Kang S.K., Ra J.C., Ko C., Lee B.C. Generation of transgenic dogs that conditionally express green fluorescent protein. Genesis. 2011. V.49(6). P.472-478. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20737
20. Kiryanova O.Yu., Garafutdinov R.R., Chemeris D.A., Giniyatov Yu.R., Gubaydullin I.M., Chemeris A.V. DNA polymorphism of dogs (Canis familiaris L.). VI. Genomic in silico barcoding of canine genomes and genomes of their wild relatives. Biomics. 2022 V.14(1). P.59-67. DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2022-4 (In Russian)
21. Krause J., Lalueza-Fox C., Orlando L. et al. The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals. Curr. Biol. 2007. V.17(21). P.1908-1912. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.008
22. Lai C.S., Fisher S.E., Hurst J.A., Levy E.R., Hodgson S., Fox M., Jeremiah S., Povey S., Jamison D.C., Green E.D., Vargha-Khadem F., Monaco A.P. The SPCH1 region on human 7q31: genomic characterization of the critical interval and localization of translocations associated with speech and language disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000. V.67(2). P.357-368. doi: 10.1086/303011
23. Lai C.S., Fisher S.E., Hurst J.A., Vargha-Khadem F., Monaco A.P. A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature. 2001. V.413(6855). P.519-523. doi: 10.1038/35097076
24. Lee S.H., Oh H.J., Kim M.J., Kim G.A., Setyawan E.M.N., Ra K., Abdillah D.A., Lee B.C. Dog cloning-no longer science fiction. Reprod Domest Anim. 2018. V.53. Suppl 3. P.133-138. doi: 10.1111/rda.13358
25. Linnaei C. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. 1758. 824 P. doi 10.5962/bhl.title.542
26. MacDermot K.D., Bonora E., Sykes N., Coupe A.M., Lai C.S., Vernes S.C., Vargha-Khadem F., McKenzie F., Smith R.L., Monaco A.P., Fisher S.E. Identification of FOXP2 truncation as a novel cause of developmental speech and language deficits. Am J Hum Genet. 2005. V.76(6). P.1074-1080. doi: 10.1086/430841
27. Maricic T., Günther V., Georgiev O., Gehre S., Curlin M., Schreiweis C., Naumann R., Burbano H.A., Meyer M., Lalueza-Fox C., de la Rasilla M., Rosas A., Gajovic S., Kelso J., Enard W., Schaffner W., Pääbo S. A recent evolutionary change affects a regulatory element in the human FOXP2 gene. Mol Biol Evol. 2013. V.30(4). P.844-852. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss271
28. Mozzi A., Forni D., Clerici M., Pozzoli U., Mascheretti S., Guerini F.R., Riva S., Bresolin N., Cagliani R., Sironi M. The evolutionary history of genes involved in spoken and written language: beyond FOXP2. Sci Rep. 2016. V.6. 22157. doi: 10.1038/srep22157
29. Olsson P.O., Jeong Y.W., Jeong Y., Kang M., Park G.B., Choi E., Kim S., Hossein M.S., Son Y.B., Hwang W.S. Insights from one thousand cloned dogs. Sci Rep. 2022. V12(1). 11209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15097-7
30. Reich D., Green R.E., Kircher M. et al. Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia. Nature. 2010. V.468(7327). P.1053-1060. doi: 10.1038/nature09710
31. Reimers-Kipping S., Hevers W., Pääbo S., Enard W. Humanized Foxp2 specifically affects cortico-basal ganglia circuits. Neuroscience. 2011. V.175. P.75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.11.042
32. Sakhabutdinova A.R., Chemeris D.A., Garafutdinov R.R., Giniyatov Yu.R., Aminev F.G., Chemeris A.V. DNA polymorphism of dogs (Canis familiaris) and its application. IV. Mitochondrial DNA. Biomics. 2021. V.13(3). P.347-359. DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197.bmcs.2021-24 (In Russian)
33. Schreiweis C., Bornschein U., Burguière E. et al. Humanized Foxp2 accelerates learning by enhancing transitions from declarative to procedural performance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014. V.111(39). P.14253-14258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414542111
34. von Merten S., Pfeifle C., Künzel S., Hoier S., Tautz D. A humanized version of Foxp2 affects ultrasonic vocalization in adult female and male mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2021. V.20(7). e12764. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12764
35. Zhang J., Webb D.M., Podlaha O. Accelerated protein evolution and origins of human-specific features: Foxp2 as an example. Genetics. 2002. V.162(4). P.1825-1835. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.4.1825
36. Zou Q., Wang X., Liu Y. et al. Generation of gene-target dogs using CRISPR/Cas9 system. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015. V.7(6). P.580-583. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjv061