eISSN: 2221-6197 DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197

Application of modern approaches to genetic systematics of prokaryotes in taxonomic studies of rhizosphere microflora

Year: 2018

Pages: 157-161

Number: Volume 10, issue 2

Type: scientific article

Summary:

Our studies and others’ reveal ambiguity in the species identification of isolates with traditional phylogenetic markers – 16S rRNA gene DNA sequence and the intergenic spacer ITS1. This ambiguity is also observed in the use of DNA sequences of gene sets, most of which have evolved independently and have their own evolutionary history. Applying the tests recommended within the genomic taxonomy of microbes, alongside whole genome DNA sequencing, has shown that evaluations of strains’ taxonomic positions depend on the type of whole genome data used, as related to the core and variable pangenome component. In addition, the number of deciphered reference genomes is limited for a sufficiently large number of taxonomic group members, making species identification incomplete at minimum. The discussed observations demonstrate the lack of a unified genetic system for species identification of isolates (as well as for prokaryote species classification itself), which justifies the use of the polyphasic approach in their systematics, combining traditional molecular genetic tests with phenotypic traits of strains. These tests, as a rule, use phylogenetic markers from the core pangenome component. They reflect only part of the evolution history of the organisms (somewhat limited in time), without allowance for horizontal gene transfer. The latter can be decisive in the acquisition of various traits by prokaryotes, which help them live in specific ecological niches and are crucial to species identification.

 

Keywords:

prokaryotes, genetic systematics, rhizosphere microflora, taxonomic studies, whole genome DNA sequencing, genomic taxonomy of microbes, microbial genomic taxonomy, polyphasic approach

References:

  1. Burygin G.L., Popova I.A., Kargapolova K.Yu., Tkachenko O.V., Matora L.Yu., Shchyogolev S.Yu. A bacterial isolate from the rhizosphere of potato (Solanum tuberosum) identified as Ochrobactrum lupini IPA7.2. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology]. 2017. V. 52, № 1. P. 105-115. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2017.1.105rus (In Russian - Бурыгин Г.Л., Попова И.А., Каргаполова К.Ю., Ткаченко О.В., Матора Л.Ю., Щеголев С.Ю. Бактериальный изолят из ризосферы картофеля (Solanum tuberosum L.), идентифицированный как Ochrobactrum lupini IPA7.2. Сельхоз. биол. 2017. Т. 52, №1. С. 105-115.
  2. Koonin E.V. The logic of chance: the nature and origin of biological evolution. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2012. 516 p. (In Russian - Кунин Е.В. Логика случая. О природе и происхождении биологической эволюции. М.: ЗАО Изд-во Центрполиграф, 2014. 527 с.)
  3. Maroniche G.A., García J.E, Salcedo F., Creus C.M. Molecular identification of Azospirillum: Limitations of 16S rRNA and qualities of rpoD as genetic markers. Microbiol. Res. 2017. V. 195. P. 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.11.009
  4. Maslunka C., Gürtler V., Seviour R.J. The impact of horizontal gene transfer on targeting the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) to identify Acinetobacter junii J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015. V. 118. P. 1435-1443. doi: 10.1111/jam.12800
  5. Oren A., Garrity G.M. Then and now: a systematic review of the systematics of prokaryotes in the last 80 years. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2014. V. 106. Р. 43-56. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-0084-1
  6. Shchyogolev Yu. On prokaryote systematics: topical problems and ways out of the crisis. Yu.A. Ovchinnikov bulletin of biotechnology and physical and chemical biology. 2018. V. 14, No. 1. P. 5-14. (In Russian - Щеголев С.Ю. О систематике прокариот: актуальные проблемы и пути выхода из кризиса. Вестник физико-химической биологии и биотехнологии. 2018. Т. 14, № 1. С. 5-14.
  7. Thompson C.C., Chimetto L., Edwards R.A., Swings J., Stackebrandt E., Thompson F.L. Microbial genomic taxonomy. BMC Genomics. V. 14, No. 913. P. 1-8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-913
  8. Trujillo M.E., Willems A., Abril A., Planchuelo A.-M., Rivas R., Ludeña D., Mateos P.F., Martínez-Molina E., Velázquez E. Nodulation of Lupinus albus by strains of Ochrobactrum lupini nov. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2005. V. 71, No. 3. P. 1318-1327. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1318-1327.2005
  9. Wiedenbeck J., Cohan F.M. Origins of bacterial diversity through horizontal genetic transfer and adaptation to new ecological niches. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. V. 35. P. 957-976. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00292.x
  10. Wisniewski-Dye F., Borziak K., Khalsa-Moyers G., Alexandre G., Sukharnikov L.O., Wuichet K., Hurst G.B., McDonald W. H., Robertson J.S., Barbe V., Calteau A., Rouy Z., Mangenot S., Prigent-Combaret C., Normand P., Boyer M., Siguier P., Dessaux Y., Elmerich C., Con-demine G., Krishnen G., Kennedy I., Paterson A.H., Gonzalez V., Mavingui P., Zhulin I.B. Azospirillum genomes reveal transition of bacteria from aquatic to terrestrial environments. PLoS Genetics. 2011. V. 7. No. 12 e1002430. P. 1-13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002430
Download pdf
up
eISSN: 2221-6197 DOI: 10.31301/2221-6197